🎧
How to Listen to Videos in English
1
Click the settings icon ⚙️ in the YouTube video player.
2
Select “Audio track” and choose “English”.

How Can We Both Let Ourselves Be Guided and Achieve Projects That Would Fulfill Us More?

Question:

Hi Remy, 

So I’m writing you this message to get your feeling on the way to approach one’s life, I like your way of seeing things (softening the mind-ego, letting yourself be guided by your intuition and being in the present moment,)
I also take certain points of view shared by Laurent Dureau, his vision of 3D, 4D things. Spark of spirit, guiding spirit, etc,
From Houssaine Ait, Marc Auburn for the SHC, and from Guillemant, Letterrier (retrocausality, synchronicity, changing your present... from your future...)
In short, I try to take what really speaks to me from several people to improve my daily life without making them gurus, I want to keep my freedom and independence of mind...
 
Here is my question:
How can one be both in letting go and letting oneself be guided by life, a bit like you.., and try to achieve one’s projects that would make us more fulfilled,
  (for example a job that suits us, or changing environment, house, activity and finding one’s passions.)
Or else try to attract one’s best future with retrocausality (as explained by Guillemant)
I feel that these 2 ways of seeing things are somewhat opposed or that finding the right balance between the two is quite subtle.. you have to find the right dosage,
In short being in the present moment and letting life guide you...
Or trying to change your present by imagining your ideal future, so that it takes shape in my present.
Or both together have their place

Thanks in advance for the time you’ll take to read this and I hope to get answers to my questions
Kind regards
Sergio
 
 

Answer:

Hi Sergio,

What you say is very interesting and I confirm the contradiction between these 2 approaches.
Indeed, just because the law of attraction exists doesn’t mean you should want to control things, and that is where some “spiritual scientists” (I don’t know how to label them) think they are on the right path without realizing they are under the sway of their mind-ego, which uses spiritual concepts to keep holding them in its comfort zone that is control.

It is not about wanting to change anything.

The priority, beyond the mental understanding of certain phenomena, is mastery of the mind-ego.
As long as your priority is to want to modify the present, you declare that you do not accept the present. Yet, being the creator of absolutely everything that happens to you, by judging what displeases you, you judge yourself. From there you can only maintain an unconscious blockage on an essential point.

So yes, you can play the sorcerer’s apprentice when you have understood certain laws (beyond human laws), but that is not enough to be at peace because it hides a dissatisfaction. Yet Peace is found in permanent satisfaction, that is, non-judgment.

That doesn’t mean you should do nothing either. What I’m saying is that Peace must take priority over the rest. And from this state of permanent Peace, then you will hear what is right to undertake in the present moment, and it has nothing to do with the will of a mind-ego that thinks it’s God. It is mastery that allows you to act fluidly at every moment without being parasitized by a personal will (like charging for conferences, for example)

This requires having Faith, and Faith is not something you acquire through the will to know, but through the good will to go beyond the mind that wants to understand before daring to follow guidance that seems irrational.

There is nothing to control, nothing to judge, there is just information wandering around that we attract according to our vibration of the moment.

So the law of attraction exists, but it is not to be put at the service of the ego because this belief that we are separate will inevitably parasitize the right guidance.

Hugs

Here, everything is given freely and without ads.
You alone decide whether to give something back if you wish to thank me.